An Analysis of Blake’s The Wild Swans at Coole Essay

An Analysis of Blake’s The Wild Swans at Coole The Wild Swans at Coole is a poem that deals with the aging process of William Butler Yeats. It is a deeply personal poem that explores the cycle of life through nature. The poem is set in Coole Park in autumn, which is located on Lady Gregory’s estate. The poet is on or near the shore of a large pond, and is observing the swans. It has been nineteen years since the first time he came to this place, and it is on this visit that he begins to realize that he is getting older. The poet parallels nature in the poem, as it represents his present state while, in the poem, there is a contrast between the poet and the swan because the swan is used as a metaphor for the poet’s youth.†¦show more content†¦The twilight introduced in line three invokes a sense of calm to the poem, but a probable uneasiness in the poet. Twilight comes in-between day and night and in a sense, the poet has come upon the twilight of his life, and is waiting for night (death) to come. The sun, which has set, represents his youth, and it can be assumed that the poet is feeling as if the best times of his life have passed him by, and all that is left to do now is to wait for death. This idea is most visible when the poet writes about the swans. The envy towards the swan’s vitality is apparent in the fourth stanza when the poet tells that Their hearts have not grown old(22) which contrasts the poet’s old age. Unlike the swans that appear to be eternal, the poet realizes that he is not and that his end is near. The use of the word mirror in line four brings together the water and the sky, which will prove to be key when the swans are introduced. The swans can paddle in the cold/ Companionable streams or climb the air. (lines 20-21) The swans are beings of both the water and the sky: They have no limits. In the second stanza the poet tells how it has been nineteen years since he first visited Coole Park. All at once the swans All suddenly mount (line 10) and leave rings in the water. These rings are important because they symbolize the rings found in the trunk of

Brutus the Tragic Hero Essay - 1059 Words

Shakespeare’s complex play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar contains several tragic heroes; a tragic hero holds high political or social esteem yet possesses an obvious character flaw. This discernible hubris undoubtedly causes the character’s demise or a severe forfeiture, which forces the character to undergo an unfeigned moment of enlightenment and shear reconciliation. Brutus, one of these tragic heroes, is a devout friend of the great Julius Caesar, that is, until he makes many execrable decisions he will soon regret; he becomes involved in a plot to kill the omniscient ruler of Rome during 44 B.C. After committing the crime, Mark Antony, an avid, passionate follower of Caesar, is left alive under Brutus’s orders to take his revenge on†¦show more content†¦Similarly, by not destroying Mark Antony along with Caesar, let alone allowing him to speak in Caesar’s funeral, Brutus engineers his future’s demise. â€Å"‘. . . Antony is but a limb of Caesar. Let’s be sacrificers, but not butchers . . . let’s kill him boldly, but not wrathfully . . . and for Mark Antony, think not of him; for he can do no more than Caesar’s arm when Caesar’s head is off’†(916). This is an even greater fallacy than the first. Antony’s rage and passion is enough force alone to drive him and the Roman army to kill every last conspirator, gossiper, and senator who was set against his great Caesar. The fiery drive behind Antony was an imminent threat to Brutus and the conspirators, yet because of Brutus’s flawed logic, Antony lived and they died. Another illustration of this is when Brutus makes the decision to allow the silver tongued Antony to speak in Caesar’s funeral. After a weak, unconvincing speech given by Brutus to the public, Antony takes center stage, capturing the hearts, minds, and attention of the people, essentially turning them on their former leader. â€Å"‘ Oh most bloody sight!’ ‘We will be revenged.’ ‘Revenge! About! Seek! Burn! Fire! Kill! Slay! Let not a traitor live!’†(954). Brutus’s most prominent, fatal flaw is his lack of sound judgment. Furthermore, the climax in Brutus’s journey as a tragic hero is when he ultimately realizes his mistakes and takes full responsibility for them. When the ghost of Caesar appears toShow MoreRelatedWas Brutus A Tragic Hero772 Words   |  4 Pagesthat brutus was just a backstabbing friend, or really a tragic hero? Marcus Brutus from William Shakespeare’s, Julius Caesar, was a tragic hero in my opinion. I am going to try and convince you that he was and why he was a tragic hero in this essay. Brutus meets all of the criteria of a tragic hero. He is arguably the protagonist of the play; he has a fatal flaw that leads to his downfall, which he cannot recover from. He had good qualities like patriotism, and he was honorable. His tragic fla wRead MoreDas Brà ¼tus: A Tragic Hero996 Words   |  4 PagesDas Brà ¼tus: A Tragic Hero In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, Brutus is the quintessence of a tragic hero. Webster’s Dictionary defines tragic hero as â€Å"Any person, especially a man, admired for courage, nobility etc. †¦ in a serious play with an unhappy ending† (277-626). This verbatim definition, however, is useless in an analytical essay. The idea of a tragic hero comes from Aristotle, who thought a tragic hero involved a character of high standing suffering a downfallRead MoreMarcus Brutus : A Tragic Hero2084 Words   |  9 Pagestheir naivety. In any case the incapability to reason turns out to be a flaw, and in the instance of Marcus Brutus, a tragic flaw. Reasoning is not characteristically present in Marcus Brutus. Brutus cannot look past his philosophical view of the world and consequently his reasoning is meddled with. This flaw he exhibits will eventually lead to his death. According to Aristotle, a tragic hero must be of noble stature and embody nob ility, they cannot be perfect, their downfall must partially be theirRead MoreDoes Brutus â€Å"Qualify† as a Tragic Hero?873 Words   |  4 PagesDoes Brutus â€Å"qualify† as a tragic hero? Marcus Brutus does qualify as the tragic hero in Shakespeare’s play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. A tragic hero is a good or even great man and thus wins our sympathy causing catharsis. A tragic hero displays hamartia— the hero makes a mistake causing the downfall of his fortune. A tragic hero usually brings suffering and death to other characters, even a whole country. Finally, a tragic hero goes into a situation in which there is no gettingRead MoreMarcus Brutus as a Tragic Hero Essay1002 Words   |  5 Pages A tragic hero in Shakespearean literature is understood as a noble and heroic character who makes a series of bad decisions based on his bad judgment that leads to his downfall and eventually death. In William Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar, the tragic hero is Marcus Brutus, a powerful Roman senator who joins a conspiracy to assassinate the Roman ruler, Julius Caesar. Marcus Brutus is a tragic hero because of his noble reputation, his mora l personality, the cathartic experience that the audienceRead MoreBrutus Is A Tragic Hero And A Sympathetic Figure2436 Words   |  10 Pageslistening to Brutus when it came to marching down to Philippi to face Antony and Octavius’s army led to the defeat of his army and Cassius committing suicide. Now we come to the main focus of this essay which is Brutus. Some people argue that Brutus is a tragic hero and a sympathetic figure. Others argue the opposite. I believe that Brutus noble qualities led to his ignoble downfall which included failure, loss, and shame. While we read through this play we can see many examples of Brutus failuresRead More Brutus is the Tragic Hero of Julius Caesar Essay858 Words   |  4 PagesBrutus is the Tragic Hero of Julius Caesar      Ã‚  Ã‚   Shakespeares play Julius Caesar is a tragic play, where the renowned Julius Caesar is on the brink of achieving total control and power by becoming emperor of the Roman Empire. Ironically enough, when he thinks he is one step away from pulling it off, his friends (most from the senate) decide to overthrow him, with Caesars most trusted friend, Marcus Brutus, acting as leader of the conspirators. Though the fall of Caesar from the mostRead MoreThe Tragic Hero Of Marcus Junius Brutus Minor Essay1418 Words   |  6 Pagesblock October 27, 2015 Tragic hero Marcus Junius Brutus Minor was the son of Marcus Junius Brutus Maior and Servilia Caepionis. His father was killed by Pompey the Great in dubious circumstances after he had taken part in the rebellion of Lepidus; his mother was the half-sister of Cato the Younger, and later Julius Caesar s mistress. Some sources refer to the possibility of Caesar being his real father,despite Caesar s being only 15 years old when Brutus was born. Brutus uncle, Quintus ServiliusRead MoreMarcus Brutus: The Tragic Hero Of Julius Ceasar972 Words   |  4 Pagesâ€Å"A man cannot become a hero until he can see the root of his own downfall.†(Aristotle). It should be noted that the Heroes downfall is his own fault as a result of his own free will, At times his death is seen as a waste of human potential. His death usually is not a pure loss, because it results in greater knowledge and awareness. In Julius Ceasar, William Shakespeare develops Marcus Brutus as the Tragic Hero whose ambition and naive ty in his blind confidence in the nobility of man sparked guidanceRead More Julius Caesar Essay: Brutus as the Tragic Hero1043 Words   |  5 PagesBrutus as the Tragic Hero of Julius Caesar  Ã‚        Ã‚  Ã‚   Shakespeare’s tragedy, Julius Caesar, displays Brutus as a tragic hero, blinded loyalty and devotion. Brutuss heroic belief of honor and virtue was so powerful that it drove him to perform villainous actions and lead to his destruction. The tragic hero is presented as a person neither entirely good nor entirely evil, who is led by some tragic flaw to commit an act that results in suffering and utter defeat. (Morner, Kathleen Rausch

Australia Recognised Rights Of Aboriginal †Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss about the Australia Recognized Rights Of Aboriginal? Answer: Introduction Mabo and others v Queensland (No 2) (1992) or Mabo case has been a significant case in Australian legislative. For this case, the high court made their historical decision on 3rd June 1992. This case was based on recognising the rights of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples since they were living in Australia for 40 to 60 thousand years before the British arrive. The case was led by Eddie Mabo which eventually changed the doctrine of terra nullius. The high court of Australia recognised the rights of Aboriginal peoples because it shows their unique relationship with the land. The decision provided by the the high court does not improved the situation of aboriginal peoples. The high court also introduced a guideline to prove the legitimacy of an indigenous community. Most of the aboriginal people did not get satisfied with the judgement of the high court. This essay will discuss the various important elements of the case and analyse its result. Further, the essay will evaluate the legal impact of Mabo case and its effect on the lives of Aboriginal peoples. Mabo Case The Mabo case is one of the most popular and important cases in Australia. The judgement of this case was given by the high court on 3rd June, after a decade long litigation. The judgement was based on reversing the doctrine of terra nullius, which did not recognise the land rights of Aboriginal peoples. The doctrine of terra nullius was based on British law, which provided that all the regulation of England will apply to a new land. According to Short (2012), the court provided that this doctrine does not apply in case of Australia since aboriginal peoples are living for more than 40 to 60 thousand years before the British reaches. The court provided that in order to apply terra nullius the lands should not be barren or inhabited, instead the land should be civilised. The existing customary law of peoples must be acceptable of England law to the extent that their own customary laws are not being modified or excluded due to inconsistency with England law. The action against the doctrine was led by Eddie Mabo, who was a Torres Strait Islander. According to the book of Loos and Mabo (2013), Mabo believes that the Australian law does not recognise the land ownership of Aboriginal people. In his childhood, the Torres Strait Islands were rigorously regulated by Queensland administration. He made a speed explaining the situation of aboriginal peoples and their ownership over the land of Torres Strait Islands. A lawyer heard the speech and ask Mabo to challenge the Australian government to properly establish their land ownership right. This case was important since it identifies the ownership right of Aboriginal peoples over their land which was taken by British without any payment or contract. As per Kennedy (2012), the Mer Islanders decided that Eddie Mabo will lead their suit to challenge the principles of terra nullius. The case ran for 10 years and on 3rd June 1992, the high court provided their decision that principle of terra nullius should not apply over Australia. As per Hayward (2012), the decision recognised the land ownership rights of Aboriginal peoples in the Torres Strait Islands, the same right which was established before British arrival will still be applicable. The high court introduced the conception of native title and recognised that some indigenous peoples have right and interest over certain lands due to their traditional regulations and customs (Council et al. 2015). The Australian parliament in order to establish the interest of aboriginal peoples in their lands passed Native Title Act in 1993. The judgement of Mabo case was known as Mabo decision. The Mabo case has considered as a historical case which gives victory to indigenous peoples in Australia. But several other indigenous peoples did not consider it as a victory. As per Chaney (2016), the judgement given by the high court was considered as one of the most controversial judgement. Various groups such as mining show their disagreement towards the decision because it would cost them more and time to extend their leases and many of their applications will be rejected. On the other hand, indigenous peoples were celebrating the opportunity of apologise against the treatment received by them. The Mabo decision granted certain right regarding the lands back to indigenous peoples but most Aboriginal peoples were not affected by the decision. The court provided various requirements which have to be fulfilled by an Aboriginal person in order to claim their right over a land. Many people consider such requirements as unfair against them. In 1996, the high court provided another landmark judgement which provided that the native title did not certainly get extinguish due to a pastoral lease. According to Holmes (2014), the aboriginal people may access to their leased rural lands if they provide significant proof of their claim thought ancestral and customary connection. In other words, if an indigenous person can establish his native title over a leased land through customary and ancestral evidence, then they can have the title of land even when there is a lease going on over it. This decision was known as Wik decision, and this judgement significantly aggravates the conservative Australia. The media coverage of this judgement backlashed and broadens the gap between land owners and indigenous peoples (Maddison 2012). The aboriginal people consider the lands Mother Earth and they had a strong bond with their lands. They build their homes, hunt food and raise their families over the same lands. They traveled freely around the country and visit various sites. As per Carmichael et al. (2013), there were several sacred sites which were considered as the dreaming by their ancestors. But it all changed in 1788 when British arrive in Australia, they were considered as white man. The first colonisers arrive in Australia and claim aboriginals lands as their own. According to the book of Montagu (2013), the first colonisers also established a system of government and regulations, the aboriginal peoples were unfamiliar with these laws. These laws did not benefit Aboriginal peoples; instead, it took their land from them and left them with nothing. The aboriginals peoples suffered due to loss of their land, therefore, they fight back to claim their ancestors land back. According to Cullen (2012), other than Mabo case, there have been several other attempts by aboriginal peoples to establish their land ownership right. In Milirrpum others v Nabalco Pty Ltd (1971) case, a suit has been taken against Nabalco Corporation to dismiss a 12-year mining lease. The arguments of the case provided that federal government did not have right to give the lease to organisations on lands which belong to aboriginal peoples. Justice Blackburn provided that there is no legal native right of aboriginal people over the lands and even if there were a law, the rights of native people were distinguished. This decision was overruled after two decades when the right of ownership of lands was provided back to aboriginal peoples in Mabo case. After the judgement of Mabo case in 1992, 126 native land title claims have been filled in the courts, in more than 90 of such claims, the native title did not get established over lands. Various communities have been established as original custodian of their ancestry lands such as south-west Victoria, Pilbara, Torres Strait and Northern territory. But a maximum number of custodian claims has been rejected by the court. Unfortunately, hundreds of land claims are waiting for trial and many people are forced to wait for years before the commencement of their trial (Gumbert 2013). Although the aboriginal peoples now have certain legal rights towards their ownership in lands, this right was based on fulfillment of certain guidelines. An aboriginal person has to meet those guidelines in order to establish their claim on the certain land. As per Glaskin and Weiner (2013), most of the land in Northern Territory that can be claimed by Aboriginal people were semi-desert or outside the towns boundaries. Most of the claims of aboriginal people were rejected by the administration, and they have to prove their legal ownership over the lands under their customary laws. They have to prove under Aboriginal regulations that they have a duty towards certain sacred sites which they are trying to claim. In South Australia, there are other rules and necessities for an Aboriginal person to fulfill, in order to establish their claim over a certain land. Many principles of Pitjantjatjara Land Rights Act was applied on an Aboriginal person when they claim their ownership over certain land. The people of Anangu Pitjantjatjara and Yankunytjatjara get only a title of 10 percent in South Australia. The land of Anangu Pitjantjatjara was established in the north and on the south of it Maralinga Lands were situated. Maralinga Lands were used by British for their nuclear tests. The aboriginal people get the land due to the regulations of Maralinga Tjarutja Land Rights Act (Hallam 2014). The Native Title Act passed by Parliament does give Aboriginal peoples right to claim their lands, but they will receive the land after completion of mining leases. Even if a land is effectively claimed by an Aboriginal person, they do not have right on the progress of such land such as mining royalties. The act does not provide right to all the indigenous communities and various communities are left with no rights over their lands, such as Yorta Yorta. Another problem arises due to division in various aboriginal peoples communities. Instead of being united, most communities fight to establish their claim over certain lands. Due to such fights, it has become tough for people to prove their claim. According to Muriel Bamblett, an aboriginal leader, these changes have caused tension between families; most of them are not even talking with each other (Savage and Gair 2014). Gary Foley, a speaker of the aboriginal community called the Mobe judgement ultimate act of dispossession since 1788. According to the book of Foley, Schaap, and Howell (2013), he said that high court has simply provided a tiny olive branch to indigenous communities and the legal rights of lands are still remains with white land owners. The purpose of the movement was to get legal land right, but instead, Aboriginal communities have got native titles. According to him, these native titles provided by the court to aboriginal peoples are entirely symbolic, and they are completely different from actual legal land rights. The judgement of the high court has legitimised the dispassion process by giving the native title to aboriginal peoples and legal right to white land owners. The court does provide land ownership to some communities, but they have to prove their ownership of the land upon some cultural connection, that is established by the High court and most of the cases are still pen ding in court. Conclusion From the above essay, it can be concluded that Mabo case judgement has been important in establishing the rights of aboriginal peoples in Australian law. The judgement recognises the right of aboriginal people over their lands and gives them the opportunity to claim their right. But for the most part, the situation of aboriginal people has not changed. The act recognises the right but in order to claim any land, an aboriginal person has to prove many guidelines. Most of such guidelines are difficult to prove and a maximum number of claims get rejected by the government. The decision of Mabo case does seem like a win for Aboriginal peoples in the beginning but actually, it does nothing to improve their situation. Still, it is significantly tough for aboriginal peoples to claim their right over a land and even after proving their claim, they are not entitled to benefits such as mining royalties. References Carmichael, D.L., Hubert, J., Reeves, B. and Schanche, A. eds., 2013.Sacred sites, sacred places(Vol. 23). Routledge. Chaney, F., 2016. Innovation in the rangelands: the role of people.The Rangeland Journal,37(6), pp.535-540. Council, K.L., Council, R.V., Council, G.I.S.S. and Council, T.S., 2015. What is Native Title?. Cullen, R., 2012. Mabo V Queensland. Foley, G., Schaap, A. and Howell, E. eds., 2013.The aboriginal tent embassy: sovereignty, black power, land rights and the state. Routledge. Glaskin, K. and Weiner, J., 2013.Customary Land Tenure and Registration in Australia: Anthropological Perspectives(p. 306). ANU Press. GUMBERT, M., 2013. Aboriginal Land Rights and Traditional Land Tenure in Australia.La terre et l'homme: Espaces et ressources convoits, entre le local et le global, p.75. Hallam, S.J., 2014.Fire and hearth: a study of Aboriginal usage and European usurpation in south-western Australia. Apollo Books. Hayward, P., 2012. Aquapelagos and aquapelagic assemblages.Shims: The International Journal of Research into Island Cultures,6(1), p.1. Holmes, J., 2014. Explorations in Australian legal geography: the evolution of lease tenures as policy instruments.Geographical Research,52(4), pp.411-429. Kennedy, D., 2012. Eddie Mabo, the man who changed Australia.Magazine. BBC News,6. Loos, N. and Mabo, E.K., 2013.Eddie Koiki Mabo: His Life and Struggle for Land Rights. Univ. of Queensland Press. Maddison, S., 2012. Postcolonial guilt and national identity: Historical injustice and the Australian settler state.Social Identities,18(6), pp.695-709. Montagu, A., 2013.Coming into being among the Australian Aborigines: The procreative beliefs of the Australian Aborigines. Routledge. Savage, D. and Gair, S., 2014. Hearing and understanding the past in order to strengthen the future. Primrose Hall. Short, D., 2012. When sorry isnt good enough: Official remembrance and reconciliation in Australia.Memory Studies,5(3), pp.293-304.

A Poison Tree by William Blake Essay Example For Students

A Poison Tree by William Blake Essay A Poison Tree by William Blake can be interpreted to be a metaphor that explains a truth of human nature. I believe that this poem teaches how anger can be dismissed by kindness and friendliness, and nurtured to become a deadly ‘poison’. The opening stanza sets up everything for the entire poem, from the ending of anger with the â€Å"friend,† to the continuing anger with the â€Å"foe. † Blake startles the reader with such clarity of the poem, which is often missed in Blake’s poems, and with metaphors that can apply to many events in life. Blake portrays this by using several forms of figurative language. The personification in A Poison Tree exists both as a means by which the poems metaphors are revealed, supported, and as a way for Blake to project the greater illustration of wrath. The wrath the speaker feels is not directly personified as a tree, but as something that grows slowly and bears fruit. In the opening stanza the speaker states, â€Å"My wrath did grow. The speaker later describes the living nature of the wrath as one which, â€Å"grew both day and night,† and, â€Å"bore an apple bright. † This comparison by personification of wrath to a tree illustrates the speakers idea that, like the slow and steady growth of a tree, anger and wrath gradually accumulate and form just as deadly as a poisoned tree. To understand the metaphorical theme of the poem, I believe you have to examine the title, A Poison Tree. This hints to the reader that some type of metaphor will be dominant throughout the poe m. In the second stanza, Blake uses several metaphors that reflect the growing and nurturing of a tree which compare to the feeding of hate and vanity explored by the speaker. The verses, â€Å"And I watered it †¦with my tears† show how the tears of life lead the deadly object that we know as A Poison Tree. The speaker goes on to say, â€Å"And I sunned it with smiles† describing not only false intentions, but the process of â€Å"sunning†, giving nutrients to a plant so that it may not only grow and live, but flourish. In both of these metaphors, the basic elements for a tree to survive, water and sunlight are shown in human despair and sadness. The religious context of the poem is also evident in two metaphorical quotations made by the speaker towards the end of the poem. The deadly fruit born from the tree is an apple, while the scene of death and treachery occurs in the speakers garden. The apple is a product of hate, a biblical metaphor for sin. This connotates that destruction will occur if the tree is showered with sour emotions. The garden, which could be viewed as a place of life and prosperity, is simply the stage for the sinful act, as it was in the Bible. Like the events of the biblical story of Adam and Eve, man gives in to the weakness of sin and feasts upon the Tree of Knowledge in the Garden of Eden. Blakes poetry, while easy to understand and simplistic, usually implies a moral motif on an almost basic level. The powerful figurative language in A Poison Tree is so apparent that it brings forth an apparent message as well. The poem is not a celebration of wrath but it is Blakes cry against it. Through this, I believe that Blake warns the reader of the dangers of repression and of rejoicing in the sorrow of our foes. From this interpretation, I believe that William Blake wrote this poem to convey a simple message. A Poison Tree may be one of Blake’s simpler poems, but is just as effective of getting its message across. He used figurative language as a way to express his point that anything beautiful in life (the tree) can be contorted to something evil or disgusting if shown ugly emotions (poison).